Major Capability Acquisition (MCA)

AAF  >  MCA >  ACATs

Acquisition Categories (ACATs)

How to use this site

Each page in this pathway presents a wealth of curated knowledge from acquisition policies, guides, templates, training, reports, websites, case studies, and other resources. It also provides a framework for functional experts and practitioners across DoD to contribute to the collective knowledge base. This site aggregates official DoD policies, guides, references, and more.

DoD and Service policy is indicated by a BLUE vertical line.

Directly quoted material is preceeded with a link to the Reference Source.

 

 

Reference Source: DoDI 5000.85 Section 3.3

 

All major capability acquisition pathway programs are designated by an ACAT. The ACAT identifies the program’s MDA, required processes, and documents. The details regarding ACATs, decision authority and associated policy are presented in Appendix 3A.

 

Reference Source: DoDI 5000.85 Appendix 3A

 

An acquisition program will be categorized based on the criteria in Table 1. Table 1 contains the description and decision authority for ACAT I through ACAT III programs. The DAE or designee will review ACAT ID programs. Pursuant to Section 2430 of Title 10, U.S.C., the service acquisition executive (SAE) will review ACAT IB programs unless otherwise specified. The CAE will review ACAT IC programs. The CAE, or the individual designated by the CAE, will review ACAT II and ACAT III and below programs.

 

Table 1. Description and Decision Authority for ACAT I – III Programs.

ACAT Reason for ACAT Designation Decision Authority
ACAT I
  • MDAP1 (Section 2430 of Title 10, U.S.C.)
    • Dollar value for all increments of the program: estimated by the DAE to require an eventual total expenditure for research, development, and test and evaluation of more than $525 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 constant dollars or, for procurement, of more than $3.065 billion in FY 2020 constant dollars
    • MDA designation
  • MDA designation as special interest3
ACAT ID: DAE
ACAT IB: SAE2
ACAT IC: Head of the DoD Component or, if delegated, the CAE
ACAT II
  • Does not meet criteria for ACAT I
  • Major system (Section 2302d of Title 10, U.S.C.)
    • Dollar value: estimated by the DoD Component head to require an eventual total expenditure for research, development, and test and evaluation of more than $200 million in FY 2020 constant dollars, or for procurement of more than $920 million in FY 2020 constant dollars
    • MDA designation (Section 2302 of Title 10, U.S.C.)
CAE or the individual designated by the CAE4
ACAT III
  • Does not meet dollar value thresholds for ACAT II or above
  • Is not designated a “major system” by the MDA
Designated by the CAE4
Footnotes
  1. Unless designated an MDAP by the Secretary of Defense (SecDef), AIS programs5, Defense Business System, programs, and programs or projects carried out using rapid prototyping or fielding procedures pursuant to Section 804 of Public Law (PL) 114-92, do not meet the definition of an MDAP.
  2. ACAT IB decision authority is assigned pursuant to Section 2430 of Title 10, U.S.C. Paragraph 3A.2.b. provides DoD implementation details.
  3. The Special Interest designation is typically based on one or more of the following factors: technological complexity; congressional interest; a large commitment of resources; or the program is critical to the achievement of a capability or set of capabilities, part of a system of systems, or a joint program. Programs that already meet the MDAP thresholds cannot be designated as Special Interest.
  4. As delegated by the SecDef or Secretary of the Military Department.
  5. An AIS is a system of computer hardware, computer software, data or telecommunications that performs functions such as collecting, processing, storing, transmitting, and displaying information. Excluded are computer resources, both hardware and software, that are: embedded as an integral part of a weapon or weapon system; used for highly sensitive classified programs (as determined by the SecDef) or other highly sensitive information technology programs (as determined by the DoD Chief Information Officer; or determined by the DAE or designee to be better overseen as a non-AIS program (e.g., a program with a low ratio of research, development, testing, and evaluation funding to total program acquisition costs or that requires significant hardware development). An AIS that breaches the dollar thresholds in Section 2302d of Title 10, U.S.C., as adjusted, is a “major system.”

 

ACAT IB Programs

  • Pursuant to subsection (d) of Section 2430, of Title 10, U.S.C., the SAE of the Military Department that is managing an MDAP reaching Milestone A after October 1, 2016 will be the MDA for the MDAP unless, based on one or more exceptions in the statute, the SecDef designates an alternate MDA.  In accordance with the December 18, 2017 Deputy Chief Management Officer memorandum, the SecDef has delegated the authority to designate an alternate MDA for an MDAP to the USD(A&S).
  • At least annually, at submission of the Program Objective Memorandum, each SAE will provide, in writing, sufficient information to the USD(A&S) to inform whether the basis for an exception exists.  This information must be provided for all programs for which the Military Department anticipates an MDD or a Milestone A decision (or later milestone decision if this will be the program’s first milestone) in the first year of the Program Objective Memorandum FYDP and that are estimated to require eventual total expenditures of funds for all increments that exceed the MDAP dollar value thresholds set in Section 2430 of Title 10, U.S.C., as adjusted and specified in Table 1.
  • Programs, for which the SAE is the MDA by operation of Section 2430 of Title 10, U.S.C., will be designated within the DoD as ACAT IB programs to differentiate these programs from ACAT ID programs, where the USD(A&S) is the MDA, or ACAT IC programs, where the USD(A&S) as the DAE has delegated the DAE’s MDA to the SAE.  Should the USD(A&S) designate the DAE or other official as the alternate MDA, based on one or more exceptions in the statute, the ACAT IB program will be redesignated as ACAT ID.
  • Pursuant to subparagraph (d)(3)(A) of Section 2430, of Title 10, U.S.C., for programs for which the USD(A&S) has designated an alternate MDA, the Secretary of the Military Department concerned, or designee, may request reversion of responsibility back to the SAE.  The USD(A&S) must make a decision with regard to the Military Department’s request within 180 days after receiving the request.  In the event the MDA for the program reverts back to the SAE, either at the request of the Military Department or at the DAE’s discretion, the program would revert from its ACAT ID designation to an ACAT IB designation.
  • SAEs managing ACAT IB programs must continue to comply with all statutes that require information about an MDAP to be provided to OSD or the Office of the USD(A&S).  For example, Section 2430 of Title 10, U.S.C., requires the SecDef to submit Selected Acquisition Reports (SARs) for MDAPs.  For ACAT IB programs, the Military Departments must continue to use the Defense Acquisition Visibility Environment system for preparation and management of APBs and SARs, to enable continued efficient and streamlined execution of Congressional reporting for all MDAPs, including ACAT IB programs, through the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Acquisition Enablers).
  • The Military Departments will use the Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval system for the ACAT IB program quarterly unit cost reporting required by Section 2433 of Title 10, U.S.C., and will continue to report other quarterly DAE Summary information.
  • All programs that have been initiated by having entered the acquisition management system at either Milestone A or a later milestone before October 1, 2016, and that are designated as either an ACAT ID or ACAT IC program, will continue to follow the acquisition information and reporting requirements described in this issuance.

 

Program Recategorization

The MDA will consider recategorization when a program’s cost growth is within 10 percent of the next higher ACAT level.